| The Palo Alto History Project |
| The "Save the Oaks" Campaign Professorville |
| The "Save the Oaks" Campaign: Palo Alto's First Environmentalists In the 20th Century urban environments were overhauled to suit the automobile. As the early “horseless carriage” --- a novelty toy for the rich --- was transformed into an essential appliance of the American Dream, the environment changed to accommodate this new way of life. In the teens and ‘20s, new roads and highways crisscrossed the country linking small towns and large cities. In the 1950s, the interstate highway system sent freeways and turnpikes over farmland, across pastoral vistas, and up (and sometimes through) mountains ranges. In the 1960s and ‘70s, highways headed for downtown, often dividing urban neighborhoods right down the middle, forcing out tenants and homeowners through the power of imminent domain. And urban main streets became increasingly suited to the automobile. Parking lots, endless strip malls (with acres of convenient parking), and six and eight lane boulevards were built to deal with ever worsening urban traffic and parking problems. Today, cities like Los Angeles are now virtually enemy territory for pedestrians who are often forced to walk downtown in elevated walkways connecting office buildings. Even in a smaller city like Palo Alto, crossing a car-friendly “traffic artery” like El Camino Real is no treat. Not that there haven’t been those who have tried to stop the ever expanding empire of the automobile. Ralph Nadar, Mike Davis, Jane Jacobs and James Howard Kunstler are some of the writers and activists who have pushed for a more pedestrian and nature-friendly urban environment. Locally, Mayor Yoriko Kishimoto has been a consistent supporter of the concept of the “walkable city,” backing shuttles, bike lanes, farmers markets and even favoring temporary day-long conversions of University Avenue to a pedestrian plaza. But Palo Alto’s first environmentalists to fight automobile dominance were those who battled to “Save the Oaks” in 1914. These were early days for the automobile, just six years after Henry Ford’s first Model T “put America on wheels.” Still, there were already some 225 Palo Alto area automobiles zigging and zagging through city streets avoiding horses, carriages, pedestrians and sometimes trees. Indeed, if the car now reigns supreme in American culture, it didn’t even have the roadway to itself in 1914. Some 132 oak trees stood in 25 Palo Alto streets, often smack dab in the center of the road. 11 oaks occupied Bryant Street over just 12 blocks and 13 oaks stood in Cowper Street over a 13 block distance. Since horse & buggies had little difficulty navigating the occasional road-blocking tree, Palo Alto’s original street grids simply let the trees stand as they had hundreds of years. But cars and trees did not easily share the roadway. Without street lights, warning signs, or windshield wipers, drivers in unfavorable conditions had a tendency to run headlong into these beautiful old oaks. Such was the case in early 1914 when Dr. Benjamin Thomas smashed head-on into a Bryant Street oak, creating an 8 inch gash in the 2 and a half foot diameter tree. He claimed that city officials were negligent for allowing such a dangerous object to remain in the street and sued for $5,000. Although he eventually lost, during the time that the case made its way through the courts, Palo Alto’s City Council considered handing over the streets to the automobile permanently. Many feared that more injuries and lawsuits lay ahead if the trees remained. Sure enough, Palo Alto Councilman George Mosher drove his car into a tree during the months that the Council was considering the issue--- it’s hard to imagine that didn’t influence his stance--- and later that year Mrs. H. J. Moule slammed into the same tree as Dr. Thomas. In fact, the Palo Alto Times reported in 1915, rather incredibly, that a dozen cars crashed into that one tree over a two year period, making one wonder if the tree didn’t have some sort of otherworldly magnetic pull. Debate was heated on both sides of the tree question. Palo Alto’s noted environmental sensibilities were apparent even in this era in the assertions that the trees should remain. One woman pleaded to Palo Altans in a Times Op-Ed to “Save their lives! With what infinite patience have they persisted through the stress of many years, offering protection to man and beast with arms continuously outstretched in love and benediction to all. No, you cannot take the life of such friends and benefactors.” Some even felt that the threat of a dangerous tree lurking down a dark street could be a beneficial incentive for drivers to slow down. 212 school children signed a petition to the City Council to spare the Oaks and one advocate wrote dreamily of two twin trees on Cowper Street, “a Gothic arch…shaped perfectly by the Creator’s hand… and placed at the gateway to our city.” But others believed that the center lane trees were an obstacle to progress, including nine out of 15 city council members. In an 1,100 word leaflet distributed to some 1,500 Palo Altans, Councilman E.A. Hettinger argued in favor of his proposal to remove any oak within sixty days standing within the “driveway part of any street from gutter to gutter.” He then placed a rather heavy burden on the voters, warning that “if you cast your vote to leave these obstructions to jeopardize life and property --- these perilous monuments to sentiment --- and a life is lost, your conscious must be your accuser for you have voluntarily shared in the blame.” Another advocate, I.A. Fickel, perhaps more reasonably contended that, “The auto has come to stay and its increase in the next 10 years will be marvelous…we have got to adjust ourselves to a faster life…every means must be used to keep the roadway clear of obstructions.” On September 11th, 1914 Palo Alto voters went to the polls to decide the fate of the trees. They soundly defeated the Hettinger plan to eliminate all street trees by a vote of 528-308. The fate of each tree was to be determined by the council individually, resulting in many trees later being “whitewashed” near their base to make easier to see on a dark night. Today you can still find an occasional whitewashed tree in Old Palo Alto. Of course, in the end the trees were fighting a hopeless battle against such revving engines of modernity. Little by little, the Oaks were brought down, clearing the way for the automobile to dominate the center of both the road and American society. -Matt Bowling |
| Sources: Palo Alto Historical Association, Palo Alto Weekly, Palo Alto Times |
| 2 live oak trees grow on Bryant Street circa 1910. (PAHA) |
| A horse and buggy approaches the Addison intersection of Bryant street. A large oak tree stands in the street further down the street. (PAHA) |
| A map of the Professorville where many of the oaks stood. Zoom in and out with the + and - symbols in the top left corner of the map... |
| Palo Alto: Then & Now |
| circa 1910 |
| 2007 |
| An ad for saving the oaks explains instructs how to mark the ballot. |
| Two views of Bryant Street with nearly a century in between. A number of oaks stand in the road at left, a few years before the street was paved. At right, a look down towards the intersection with Addison and a controversial traffic circle. |
| Bryant Street at Lincoln Street where an oak stands in the way. (PAHA) |
| A trolly passes Hale Street and an oak tree on University Avenue. |
| Long time council member George Mosher, who crashed into a street tree in 1915. |
| Bryant Street beset with oaks. (PAHA) |
| A tree remains in the road on Cowper Street across from the Kathleen Norris house. |
| Oak trees stand in the road on Palo Alto Street. |
| A chopped down oak in Professorville. |
| An expansive oak in Professorville. |
